Caveat Emptor – at Least a Little

Some of you may be aware of the bombshell study done by Yale University which identifies Post-Vaccination Syndrome (PVS). It posits that perhaps what is called “long covid” is actually a serious injury from the Covid shots.

In the Yale News story linked above, the University starts with the usual claptrap about how many lives the shots saved, how rare PVS is, and what a blessing the sciency fiction they impose on us all really is. But at the bottom of paragraph four, they subtly give up the game, refuting most of the happy claptrap they began with. “More studies are needed to understand the prevalence of PVS,” they write, tacitly admitting they don’t have a clue how many people it affects and how widespread it is.

What this all translates to, in layman’s terms, is that (at least in some people) the Covid shots begin breaking down the larger immune system until a person effectively has no effective immune system left. It entirely destroys your immune system eventually.

Some of you may remember the 1976 TV movie, The Boy in the Plastic Bubble. It was about a boy with so severe an immune deficiency that he had to live in a perfectly sterile environment to survive. As Chief Brody from Jaws might somberly say, after reading this report, “We’re going to need a bigger bubble.”

Many alternative media outlets jumped on this, as it is the first significant concession by the establishment that maybe the Covid shots were killing some people – that it was not quite as “safe and effective” as both the degraded medical establishment and the idiot press had insisted. The author I linked to at the beginning of this paragraph claims he knew this within a year and a half of the introduction of the shots. I believe him – while claiming pride of place as knowing much earlier.

I wrote, on December 23, 2020 in the piece, Embers in the Wind, that the Covid shots were likely to become the greatest medical disaster in history. In the piece, I vastly underestimated the public’s tolerance for intentional authoritarian bullying. Yet if effective reaction came about three years later than I expected, the rest of it holds up remarkably well. We were lucky I was wrong, for if the reaction had come when I thought it would, it could only have been accompanied by widespread violence and strife.

To call the Covid shots a “vaccine” literally required medical authorities to redefine what a vaccine is, for the Covid shots did not qualify under the classic definition that had existed since the beginning of vaccines. The Covid shots are immunotherapy, which is a form of gene therapy. About 45 years ago, scientists were touting gene therapy as the great new breakthrough that was going to change everything, curing almost all human illnesses and diseases. Within decade, scientists’ dreams lay in ashes. Gene therapy turned out to be an ocean of abject failure with a few islands of limited success. Scientists’ fantasy that they would be better, more humane gods than the real one crashed and burned once again. The media, which at the beginning of the ‘80s, had touted this next great breakthrough, let its abysmal failure go quietly, for they, too, had succumbed to the devil’s first seduction, that man could supplant and become God.

The Covid shots gave scientists another bite at the apple of gene therapy. Of course, the idiot media, which knows nothing, grabs eagerly at anything sciency-sounding to confirm their sense of superiority, then sneers condescendingly at anyone who actually does know something, were taken in hook, line and sinker. Hey, this gene therapy was delivered with a hypodermic, so it must be a vaccine, they reasoned. By this reasoning, lethal injections are a vaccine, too. (In fairness, anyone given a lethal injection is, thereafter, immune to all illnesses and diseases.)

I knew what it was. It didn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out, just a little basic research. For nearly 15 years before the Covid shots were introduced to people, research with mRNA shots had been done on various animals. In almost all the studies, all the animals eventually died an untimely death, because the mRNA shots progressively disabled their immune systems entirely. A few died quickly as the shots would trigger other serious syndromes to which they were susceptible, most died later of other diseases, such as cancer, that their weakened immune systems could not fight off, but all eventually died untimely, with the bulk not even aware that anything was wrong until they died suddenly because their immune systems had been entirely destroyed.

I will never forget my public discussion with a doctor, a well-meaning, faith-filled man, who was a staunch advocate of the Covid shots. I asked him a bunch of questions, annoyed that he often tried to give deceptive answers that I quickly called out. To his credit, when I did call out his stock answers, he conceded the truth. Finally, he said boldly that the mRNA shots had been tested on animals for almost a decade and a half, so it was not true that they had not been tested. I told him I was very familiar with the animal tests, but did not know of any that were successful – and asked if he would email me the ones he knew of that were. That was the end of it. He hung his head and told me hewas unaware of any, either, but that medical officials in Washington had assured him they had solved the problems.

I dropped the subject entirely. He seemed like a nice enough fellow, I had made my point, and I am not much interested in being a grinder after winning the debate. I am a big admirer of Abraham Lincoln who, when asked how to treat Confederate military and political officials after the war was won, replied, “Let ‘em up easy.”

I get annoyed when someone with a deep, specific expertise, acts if anyone who does not share that expertise is stupid. Most people have expertise in different areas – and what is one man’s delight is another’s impenetrable puzzle. We need to help each other out and remember that most people don’t share our particular niche expertise.

But I get equally annoyed when people describe listening to whatever their favored news source says as “research.” Sheesh, when I was a young man I had to haunt libraries, visit various arcane archives, and make formal requests of institutions for the raw data which constituted actual research. The internet has made it much easier to do real research – and yet people do not seem to even understand what the term means anymore. A minimal amount of real research would have revealed to anyone what rank propaganda the Covid shot assurances were. You didn’t need a science or a medical degree. You just had to know what questions to ask – and the fortitude to tell the sneering ignoramuses to answer the question when they tried to dismiss you.

I am hardly trying to encourage people to become master researchers. But if you are to protect yourselves and your family, you need to know a little. Actually, through most of our history, it was assumed that people would know enough to navigate competing claims reasonably safely. It was called Caveat Emptor – let the buyer beware. With all the snake oil the “experts” are busily peddling, we better learn to be minimally wary. Truth will stand the test of examination. Learn enough on any subject of consequence to ask the right questions – and the “experts” will have a much tougher time imposing snake oil on you.